First of all, both debates presented their thesis very clear to audiences. However, the first group was most dynamic because there was an interaction between people who were disagreement that any professional can be a teacher and people who were in favor of this. These two teams showed a lot of important arguments trying to convince audience which group was right. But, I think that it was lack of information about some argument that some people said, this is one of the things that have to be improved. I really think that the group which won was people who were against professionals can be a teacher in schools. Because of, I am convinced that a teacher has to respect his or her carrier as well as doctors or lawyers do it.
Unfortunately, the second group, which topic was voluntary votes, made a mistake because there do not exist any team which were against this topic. For that reason, audiences had to participate in order to create a real debate; this situation was very interesting and entertaining because all of us had the opportunity to express our thoughts about it. Nevertheless, there were some people who did not had good manage of the topic, so I think that some of them needed to prepare much better their arguments in order to convince to audience that their were right finding more information about this topic. In this case, I think that any group won because it did not have enough information to support ideas.
Correction about Debate
Hace 15 años
I agree with you when you say that what happened with the second debate was very interesting. As the second debate hadn’t a team in a different stance to the other one, audience was invited to play the role that was missed. It was an unexpected but good experience. Then as the audience had not prepared to interact in this debate before, the audience wasn’t nervous and said what they thought about it in a comfortable way.
ResponderEliminarI'm correcting Barbara's.
ResponderEliminarFirst of all, both debates presented their thesis very clear to S/P *audiences. However, the first group was SM* most dynamic SM* because there was an interaction between people who were SM* disagreement that any professional can be a teacher and people who were in favor of this. These two teams showed a lot of important arguments trying to convince SM* audience which group was right. But, I think that it was lack of information about ( )*some S/P*argument that some people said, this is one of the things that have to be improved. I ( )*really think that the group which won was WW* people who were against professionals can WW*be a teacher in schools. WW*Because of, I am convinced that a teacher has to respect his or her carrier as well as doctors or lawyers do ( )*it.
ResponderEliminarUnfortunately, the second group, which topic was voluntary votes, made a mistake because there WW*do not exist any team which were against this topic. For that reason, S/P*audiences had to participate in order to create a real debate; this situation was very interesting and entertaining because all of us had the opportunity to express our thoughts about it. Nevertheless, there were some people who did not had good manage of the topic, so I think that some of them needed to prepare much better their arguments in order to convince to ( )* audience that their were right finding more information about this topic. In this case, I think that any group won because it did not have enough information to support ideas.
First of all, both debates presented their thesis very clear to audiences. However, (the first group was most dynamic because there was an interaction between people who were disagreement that any professional can be a teacher and people who were in favor of this)SS/ ?M. These two teams showed a lot of important arguments trying to convince audience which group was right. But, I think that it was lack of information about some argument that some people said, this is one of the things that have to be improved. I really think that the group which won was people who were against professionals can be a teacher in schools. (Because of)WE, I am convinced that a teacher has to respect his or her carrier as well as doctors or lawyers do it.
ResponderEliminarUnfortunately, the second group, which topic was voluntary votes, made a mistake because there do not exist any team which were against this topic. For that reason, audiences S/P had to participate in order to create a real debate; this situation was very interesting and entertaining because all of us had the opportunity to express our thoughts about it. Nevertheless, there were some people who did not had good manage of the topic, so I think that some of them needed to prepare much better their arguments in order to convince to audience that their WW were right finding more information about this topic. In this case, I think that any group won because it did not have enough information to support ideas.
Nicole, I told you all specifically not to correct a post that had already been corrected. Now, someone else is lacking a correction.
ResponderEliminar