Correction Post

First of all, both debates presented their thesis very clear to all audiences. However, the first group was the most dynamic one because there was an interaction between people who were in disagreement that any professional can be a teacher and people who were in favor of this. These two teams showed a lot of important arguments trying to convince to audience which group was right. But, I think that it was lack of information about some arguments that some people said, this is one of the things that have to be improved. I think that the winner group was people who were against professionals could be a teacher in schools. I am convinced that a teacher has to respect his or her carrier as well as doctors or lawyers do respect their professions.

Unfortunately, the second group, which topic was voluntary votes, made a mistake because there was any team which was against this topic. For that reason, all audiences had to participate in order to create a real debate; this situation was very interesting and entertaining because all of us had the opportunity to express our thoughts about it. Nevertheless, there were some people who did not had good manage of the topic, so I think that some of them needed to prepare much better their arguments in order to convince that their were right finding more information about this topic. In this case, I think that any group won because it did not have enough information to support ideas.